May 21, 2012

Border Politics: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly – from the inbox

(reprint – from the inbox)

The Truth Hurts

“Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.”
Quote by Albert Einstein

On three occasions in the last twelve months I have toured the border east of Douglas with various dignitaries including authors, Tea Party leaders, filmmakers and three congressman: Jason Altmire and Tim Holden from Pennsylvania, and John Barrow from the state of Georgia. If you stand at the international boundary where it traverses the southern edge of the San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge, you can look east and west and see a stretch of road right next to the border fence and get a panoramic view at least fifteen miles in length. At no time on any of these three trips did we encounter, or see, a single border patrol vehicle or agent. Why isn’t the Border Patrol on the border?

Twenty-seven miles straight north of the San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge, five miles north of Highway 80, on Price Canyon Road, there is a Border Patrol camp. While three shifts of agents work out of this camp, Mexican outlaws pack dope on a nightly basis a mere stone’s throw away from the FEMA surplus camp trailers that house these Border Patrol employees. I live where Price Canyon Road leaves the highway, and I view Border Patrol vehicles going to and fro 15 times an hour – 24/7. Off-duty agents drive into town in government vehicles to get supplies, and none of them that you ask will tell you they catch more than one in four illegal aliens; many estimates are one in ten.

In the last several years Mexican cartel employees have started numerous forest fires in Cochise County costing the American taxpayer hundreds of millions to fight. In the summer of 2011, the Horseshoe Fire #2 burned the entire Chiricahua Mountain range down and that fire alone cost the U.S. Treasury fifty million to put out. Since that fire, the National Forest Service, who refuses to acknowledge the fires were started by outlaw Mexicans, have installed large metal gates on all major roads entering forest lands in the Chiricahua range.

On Tex Canyon Road a mile or so above the Krentz Ranch, the new gate is a few steps away from a large sign installed by the federal government warning all who see it that drug smugglers and criminal aliens are known to be in the area. The heavy metal gate that cost taxpayers $2,500.00 to build has one purpose: to deny access to you and me on what is supposed to be public land. Mexican outlaws are free to roam, but you and I will soon be locked out. Why do Mexican outlaws have more freedom that I have?

A Border Patrol supervisor from the camp on Price Canyon Road recently told a neighboring rancher that he was going to have to take some mandatory time off. “Why?” The rancher asked. The agent replied he had exceeded the maximum overtime limit and, if he didn’t stand down for several weeks, he would be making too much money. “How much do you make?” the rancher asked. “Oh, I’ll pull down about $134 thousand this year,” was the agent’s reply.

In the last decade job growth in the private sector has increased 1 percent, compared to 15 percent in government. When this recession started a couple years ago, the U.S. Department of Transportation had one employee making $170,000 a year; today there are 1,690. Employees in the Department of Defense making over $150,000 a year have increased in numbers from 1,168 to 10,100 in a couple years. Since Obama has been elected President, federal employees making over $100,000 have doubled in number. Per capita, individuals who are employed by the federal government make over twice as much as those employed in the private sector. The Border Patrol itself has 21,000 plus agents. I wonder how many of these would vote for a candidate who truly wanted to seal the border?

In the last few months I have interviewed numerous business people and law enforcement personnel from several agencies. I ask them how many businesses in border towns like Douglas are legitimate and how many are mere fronts for money laundering and other illegal activities relative to cartel smuggling. The lowest estimate given me was 20 percent who are involved to some degree with illegal border trade. The highest estimate was 80 percent, with most people I talked to saying it’s somewhere between 35 percent and 50 percent. No one I questioned denies a large underground economy that benefits not only Mexicans but many U.S. citizens, some of whom have ties to Washington D.C. The drug trade in Mexico is estimated to be a trillion dollar industry. No one knows for sure how big it is, but everyone agrees that it is so awash with cash that it makes the GDP of many nations in the world pale in comparison.

I am acquainted with a plain clothes NARC detective (who is not employed by a federal agency). In a conversation a few months ago he told me a story how in the mid-nineties he and other officers, after making a large narcotics bust, acquired enough evidence to arrest three U.S. Customs agents for taking bribes and, in the course of the investigation on these agents’ treasonous acts, they put together a cut-and-dried case that should have convicted them. They couldn’t even get an indictment. He explained that the U.S. Customs agency itself didn’t want the bad publicity. The judge was apathetic and the district attorney was lazy – nobody cared. At the end of this story, he looked at me with disgust and said, “Right today, I know of ten agents working at the port of entry between Douglas and Agua Prieta that are taking bribes, and there is nothing I can do about it.”

The idea that a fence from San Diego to Brownsville will fix the border problem is a fantasy. The border isn’t sealed because too many people are getting immensely wealthy doing business under the radar, and many of them are Americans. For Washington politicians, there is too much power at stake to actually find real solutions.

We don’t need a fence; we need a change in the rules of engagement. About ten years ago, about a dozen Cochise County ranchers, including myself had a meeting with Congressman Tom Tancredo. Mr. Tancredo is a true pioneer in trying to expose truth about border violence and the flood of illegal activity on the border. He told us that, on any given day, it was impossible to find over two or three individuals in the capitol building who would be willing to discuss border issues. Everyone in Washington, Mr. Tancredo said, considers the problem on the border political suicide.

The impotent gangster, Felipe Calderon, who is nothing but a puppet in a regime completely out of control, gets an invite from Obama himself to address a joint session of Congress. His speech, which Obama hoped he could use to embarrass conservatives in general and Arizona in particular, was considered a smashing success by all on the left. Congressmen Altmire, Holden, and Barrow were there along with Giffords, Pelosi, Reed, Grijalva and McCain, standing – cheering. We bomb Qadafi without a declaration of war and ignore the plague of human atrocities committed daily in Felipe Calderon’s country.

In an article in the New American on Friday, January 13, 2012, written by Brian Koenig, some enlightening statistics about the U.S. Customs and Immigration service are revealed. The article states that over half of USCIS officials say that Obama puts more focus on promoting immigration that on national security. Twenty-four percent of USCIS officials say that they are pressured by their superiors to approve applications that should have been rejected. The article goes on to say that five veteran employees were either demoted or given a choice to relocate because they were too tough on individuals applying for immigration benefits. “People are afraid,” said one veteran employee. “Integrity only carries a person so far because they’ve got to pay the rent.”

I personally have had a dozen or more Border Patrol agents tell me their superior officers purposely cause them to be unsuccessful. Border Patrol agents who are aggressive are given desk jobs and incompetence is rewarded. There are several agents in prison for simply doing their jobs. Agent Brian Terry lost his life because of the Obama administration’s refusal to call the situation what it is: dangerous. Bean bags should never have been an option.
In the last few weeks there has been considerable uproar over SB 1867. This bill was coauthored by none other than Arizona’s own Manchurian candidate, John McCain. It gives, among other things, the President the right to send the U.S. Army to your house and arrest you if he (in this case, Obama) deems you are a threat to National Security. No due process, no phone call, no attorney, no trial, only the Gulag. Of course Obama promises to never misuse the language of the bill which he and McCain think we, the people, have misinterpreted.

Perhaps at this time the contents of this bill seem benign, but I believe in the not-too-distant future this is going to change. The situation in Mexico continues to deteriorate and, in spite of what Obama says, the effects of cartel presence within our borders increases daily. The United States government will eventually be forced to acknowledge we are in a war, if not with Mexico, at least with the Mexican drug cartels. Experts say that the cartels now control seventy percent of Mexico, so war with Mexico or war with Mexican drug cartels is for all practical purposes one and the same.

If and when the U.S. government (which means Obama or whoever is on the throne) realizes war has come home to roost, the language in SB 1867 could take on a more relevant tone. Could it at that time seem more acceptable for a president to arrest someone who has the reputation of being dangerous?
This puts a whole new light on Joe Biden’s comment that the Taliban isn’t the real enemy.

Under Obama, respect for the constitution and the rule of law have been replaced by post-millennial political activism. Patriotism has become a dirty word. The Obama agenda is not, nor has it ever been, solution driven. This is most evident in the President’s refusal to acknowledge the well documented relationship the Mexican drug cartels have with Hamas, Hezbollah and other terrorist groups who want to destroy America.

Since Obama became President we’ve had no federal budget, [we have] colossal debt, [an] embarrassing foreign policy, no energy policy, higher gas prices, no Keystone pipeline, higher unemployment, increased class warfare, embarrassing government subsidies to companies doomed to bankruptcy, praise from the White House toward Wall Street occupiers, and open hatred for Tea Party activists, violence and increased anarchy on the Mexican border, increased anger, frustration , confusion, depression, hysteria, and disgust from the American public, which leads to more executive power, more departmental czars, increased regulation, federal intervention, and eventually we will have martial law.

As Rahm Emmanuel said, “You never want a good crisis to go to waste.”
By now you are probably thinking, “This guy is paranoid.” I have contemplated this and have decided that paranoia rests on a higher plane than deliberate naivete and cultivated stupidity. One doesn’t have to participate in the current dumbing down of America.

Connect the dots and fill in the spaces. The border isn’t getting sealed, because too many people are getting rich and powerful perpetuating the red hot economy that drug and human trafficking fuels. Anarchy, cruelty, and killing are just unfortunate byproducts of the crisis that Obama and Holder and Napolitano refuse to recognize.

In a recent conversation I had with Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever, who is an honorable man, I remarked to him, “Larry, several people have told me that the cartel is going to kill me because of the articles I’ve written. What do you think?” He replied, “Yes, there are people who would kill you if given the opportunity.” He paused momentarily, staring at me, and then continued, “But who you really need to worry about is the U.S. government. They have ways of punishing people like you.”

That begs another question, “Who are you afraid of?” The possibilities are endless.

Ed Ashurst
Apache, Arizona
January 26, 2012

Help Stop Sopa/PIPA

The following post is from WordPress.org and we tend to agree that nobody likes to get into politics but when the ruling elite have distanced themselves so far from reality we need to be the agents of change. We ask that all who read and share here spend a moment to reflect on how crazy and derisive our world has become and take steps to bring your world back to compromise and rational behavior.  We want to keep our freedom of expression and I think you do to. Here is the article please read and reflect:

You are an agent of change. Has anyone ever told you that? Well, I just did, and I meant it.

Normally we stay away from from politics here at the official WordPress project — having users from all over the globe that span the political spectrum is evidence that we are doing our job and democratizing publishing, and we don’t want to alienate any of our users no matter how much some of us may disagree with some of them personally. Today, I’m breaking our no-politics rule, because there’s something going on in U.S. politics right now that we need to make sure you know about and understand, because it affects us all.

Using WordPress to blog, to publish, to communicate things online that once upon a time would have been relegated to an unread private journal (or simply remained unspoken, uncreated, unshared) makes you a part of one of the biggest changes in modern history: the democratization of publishing and the independent web. Every time you click Publish, you are a part of that change, whether you are posting canny political insight or a cat that makes you LOL. How would you feel if the web stopped being so free and independent? I’m concerned freaked right the heck out about the bills that threaten to do this, and as a participant in one of the biggest changes in modern history, you should be, too.

You may have heard people talking/blogging/twittering about SOPA — the Stop Online Piracy Act. The recent SOPA-related boycott of GoDaddy was all over the news, with many people expressing their outrage over the possibilities of SOPA, but when I ask people about SOPA and its sister bill in the Senate, PIPA (Protect IP Act), many don’t really know what the bills propose, or what we stand to lose. If you are not freaked out by SOPA/PIPA, please: for the next four minutes, instead of checking Facebook statuses, seeing who mentioned you on Twitter, or watching the latest episode of Sherlock*, watch this video (by Fight for the Future).

PROTECT IP / SOPA Breaks The Internet from Fight for the Future on Vimeo.

 

Some thoughts:

  • In the U.S. our legal system maintains that the burden of proof is on the accuser, and that people are innocent until proven guilty. This tenet seems to be on the chopping block when it comes to the web if these bills pass, as companies could shut down sites based on accusation alone.
  • Laws are not like lines of PHP; they are not easily reverted if someone wakes up and realizes there is a better way to do things. We should not be so quick to codify something this far-reaching.
  • The people writing these laws are not the people writing the independent web, and they are not out to protect it. We have to stand up for it ourselves.

Blogging is a form of activism. You can be an agent of change. Some people will tell you that taking action is useless, that online petitions, phone calls to representatives, and other actions won’t change a single mind, especially one that’s been convinced of something by lobbyist dollars. To those people, I repeat the words of Margaret Mead:

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.

We are not a small group. More than 60 million people use WordPress — it’s said to power about 15% of the web. We can make an impact, and you can be an agent of change. Go to Stop American Censorship for more information and a bunch of ways you can take action quickly, easily, and painlessly. The Senate votes in two weeks, and we need to help at least 41 more senators see reason before then. Please. Make your voice heard.


 

The Audacity of the Political process – from the inbox

AUDACITY

Anyone want to know the definition of “AUDACITY”? HERE IT IS!

Secret Service Buys Two New $1.1 Million Buses For A Three-Day Presidential Campaign Trip While The President Flies Ahead Of The Buses. U.S. President Barack Obama walks to his bus as he arrives in Minneapolis – St. Paul International Airport , Minnesota, August 15, 2011, where he is to begin his three-day bus/fly tour in the Midwest centering on the economy. He FLIES into an airport somewhere in the Midwest, hops into one of two brand new Canadian built $1.1 Million buses, paid for by you and me, for a bus/fly tour around the Midwest’ and after an hour or so, gets driven back to the airport for ANOTHER FLIGHT, lands at another airport where another $1.1 Million brand new black Canadian bus is waiting for him and then, repeats all that until his Midwest “bus/fly tour” is done?

Oh yes… and THEN, he leaves on a 10 day vacation to Martha’s Vineyard … to REST UP from this campaign bus/fly tour! And don’t forget… those brand new shiny black Canadian buses AREN’T DRIVEN to the location where they meet Obama. Those buses are loaded up on one or more C-17s so that they can be flown to the destination ahead of the president who is flying in Air Force One. AND!.. Believe it or not this is REPEATED FOR EVERY CAMPAIGN STOP.

On this ‘bus/fly tour’, the Pres. will lecture the ‘little people’ on how they need to live within their means while hinting of possible future government cut-backs and a need to raise revenues (Taxes)! Obama’s personal ‘carbon footprint’ must be as large as most cities by now. Unbelievably, ALL of this is on the taxpayer’s dollar! But remember, this is NOT a campaign trip – it is a “Meet With The People” trip only! Consequently, the Democrat National Committee does NOT have to pay a cent for all of this extravagant ‘campaign’ spending.

Fall of the Republic

Knowledge is power…you will be assimilated.

Chalk ONE up for Obama on Osama

Hat’s off to Barack Obama for making the key DECISIVE decision to remove Osama Bin Laden, OBL, from Pakistan and the American psyche for the time being. No PB is not a pessimist but we look beyond the obvious for subtle clues that enlighten some, not all, of the issues to consider behind the posturing. For a number of years most of us have probably considered that with high probability OBL has been hiding in Pakistan, a country many feel with sympathies to the radical Islamic cause.

Pakistan is obviously  located in close proximity to Afghanistan and would provide the easiest location to hide from the world given enough resources, money, friends, and perhaps extended family (which naturally includes local and national Pakistani politicians). Given this knowledge it has long been known with some measure of certainty that OBL ran his organization from this region and it is surprising how long it took to find and deal with OBL. This just proves that the difficulty for the United States to operate in the Middle East.

While we give the highest kudos to Obama on this mission we feel it is necessary to look under the hood to discern the facts surrounding this mission after all it was or has been a “team” effort of many people. Secondly the political ramification of killing OBL has significance to Obama and his bid to seek a second term in the face of many flagging issues facing his administration; OUR nation. Third we fully expect a procession of information to be released that supports and glorifies the Obama administration and its efforts. While we give kudos we would like to see Obama give credit where credit is due as it is beyond the obvious. This is a tall order for Obama who has had trouble finding decisive focus on America’s internal struggles in his first two years of leadership.

The timing of the operation to remove Osama Bin Laden from Pakistan is carefully orchestrated to coincide with the launch of Obama’s re-election campaign. In the end this is about Politics and timing, an unfortunate by-product of the political process. Again I suggest we re-visit and review some of the recent major wars America has fought and the true results: “War on Terrorism”, “War in Iraq”, “War in Afghanistan”, “War on Drugs”, and “War on Poverty” to name a few that come to mind. In each of these “wars” we lack a clear vision of what we wan to accomplish and often demonstrate poor results over the long run.

Perspective

  1. America and it’s leaders need to use more focus in solving national problems as Obama demonstrated on Sunday; especially if we are going to dilute the meaning of war by combining it with social issues.
  2. America’s military power has been developed over it’s existence and is the result of many resulting improvements and investments.
  3. America’s military should be used sparingly and judiciously with financial transparency.
  4. America is a polarized country where all must find common and middle ground to find focus and solve problems.
  5. All leaders must be forthright in admitting and learning from failure. It’s a cultural thing.
  6. War must be fought or executed to reasonable conclusion not in the lingering bankrupting fashion we currently execute the process.
  7. If we call it a WAR we should have a decisive policy to achieve the results of the investment we apply.

With a steep bow and hat’s off we ask our leaders to find a way to incorporate this level of decisiveness observed on Sunday in all aspects of American politics. Think – Plan – Do!

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes